On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 09:57:09AM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 13.07.2016 23:36, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > It looks like v4 doesn't need the fat-rwlock change, then? I had been > > planning to review it but I'll skip it in that case. Please let me know > > if you still want me to review it. > > It will be great if you'll take a look on first patch of this series. It > extends current implementation of rwlock with some new features. Maybe > someone will use this functionality in the future. Anyway it'll be sad to > just let it fade away somewhere in mail-list.
OK, I'll plan to review it. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
