First two patches "Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval."
Could anyone approve them? 'fat-rwlock's are very suspicious. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. On 11.07.2016 18:15, Ilya Maximets wrote: > This is the second part of XPS patch-set which contains XPS itself. > Implementation will use dp->ports structure by PMD threads. This > requires replacing of port_mutex with rwlock. > > Also generic changes applied to fat-rwlock itself to add new > functionality: Upgrading read-lock to write-lock and backward. > > Patches 1 and 2 are new ones. > Patch 3 is a little fixed one from v2: > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-May/070901.html > > Version 3: > * Dropped already applied changes. > * fat-rwlock used instead of port_mutex. > * revalidation of 'non-pmd' thread's tx queues added to > 'dpif_netdev_run' to make it faster. > > Ilya Maximets (3): > fat-rwlock: Make fat-rwlock upgradable. > dpif-netdev: Use fat-rwlock to protect dp->ports. > dpif-netdev: XPS (Transmit Packet Steering) implementation. > > lib/dpif-netdev.c | 233 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > lib/fat-rwlock.c | 56 ++++++++++++- > lib/fat-rwlock.h | 11 +++ > 3 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
