On 13.07.2016 23:36, Ben Pfaff wrote: > It looks like v4 doesn't need the fat-rwlock change, then? I had been > planning to review it but I'll skip it in that case. Please let me know > if you still want me to review it.
It will be great if you'll take a look on first patch of this series. It extends current implementation of rwlock with some new features. Maybe someone will use this functionality in the future. Anyway it'll be sad to just let it fade away somewhere in mail-list. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
