On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:22:01AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > On Sep 14, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 09/14/2015 04:14 PM, ALeX Wang wrote: > >> On 14 September 2015 at 08:33, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not sure what you mean. The cache that ovs-vsctl implements is only > >>> a cache; that is, leaving it out it doesn't affect correctness. On the > >>> other hand, if there is a cache, then logic is needed to invalidate the > >>> cache if anything changes. > >>> > >>> Maybe you could give an example of the problem you see? > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Sorry, I was confused to believe that cache is compulsory,... it is > >> just used for easy access, using hash. > >> > >> Then, looks good to me~ maybe Russell would also like to look at this? > > > > Thanks for asking, but no need. I think the idea of converting to > > db-ctl-base makes perfect sense. I'm happy if the code looks good to you. > > > > I use it a good bit when testing things, so I'll be sure to report or > > fix anything i run in to. :-) > > Ben, it doesn't look like you've checked this in. Are you still > waiting on an ACK? Alex, did you do a full review?
I was just too busy with unrelated nonsense. It's in now. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
