> On Sep 14, 2015, at 1:27 PM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 09/14/2015 04:14 PM, ALeX Wang wrote: >> On 14 September 2015 at 08:33, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure what you mean. The cache that ovs-vsctl implements is only >>> a cache; that is, leaving it out it doesn't affect correctness. On the >>> other hand, if there is a cache, then logic is needed to invalidate the >>> cache if anything changes. >>> >>> Maybe you could give an example of the problem you see? >>> >>> >> >> Sorry, I was confused to believe that cache is compulsory,... it is >> just used for easy access, using hash. >> >> Then, looks good to me~ maybe Russell would also like to look at this? > > Thanks for asking, but no need. I think the idea of converting to > db-ctl-base makes perfect sense. I'm happy if the code looks good to you. > > I use it a good bit when testing things, so I'll be sure to report or > fix anything i run in to. :-)
Ben, it doesn't look like you've checked this in. Are you still waiting on an ACK? Alex, did you do a full review? --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
