Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 05:29:10PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote: >On 08/26/14 11:22, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >>I do not think that really matters. Phase one is flows. After that we >>can focus on l2/l3. If we would be able to fit in in flows (some drivers >>may), then ok. If not, we extend the api with couple of more l2/l3 >>related ndos. I see no problem there. > >Well, it matters because we are proceeding to implement L2/3. >i.e the simple stuff first. We dont have anything to show yet - but >we will hopefully have some useful bit by Plumbers. >So maybe best path forward is we talk then and see how we can merge >efforts since we cant seem to agree at this point.
I think we are in agreement. We have two worlds: flows and l2/3. We need both for sure. And my patchset adds an initial part of the first one. The second one can be added later. I do not see any issues in that. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
