On 08/26/14 16:54, Thomas Graf wrote:
On 08/26/14 at 01:13pm, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
I think it's important distinction. In-kernel OVS is not OF.
It's a networking function that has hard-coded packet parser,
N-tuple match and programmable actions.
There were times when HW vendors were using OF check-box
to sell more chips, but at the end there is not a single HW
that is fully OF compliant. OF brand is still around, but
OF 2.0 is not tcam+action anymore.
Imo trying to standardize HW offload interface based on OF 1.x
principles is strange.
I actually have no issues with whatever classifier someone decides
to use. To each their poison. But I do take issue mandating the
specified classifer it as THE CLASSIFIER as in this case,
is where i start taking issue. I have a few things that i offload
to hardware with speacilized classifiers such that i object strongly
to the approach this driver has taken.
cheers,
jamal
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
