Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:58:54PM CEST, j...@mojatatu.com wrote: >On 08/26/14 10:06, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >>Yes. Flows are phase one. The api will be extended in for whatever is >>needed for l2/l3 as you said. Also I see a possibility to implement the >>l2/l3 use case with flows as well. > >And as a note: This is where i have the disagreement. >It is good there is acknowledgement you are handling flows for now. >Or whatever tuples you defined as "flow". I dont think L2 or 3 fit >in that. If thats not what you are saying then we are in agreement.
I do not think that really matters. Phase one is flows. After that we can focus on l2/l3. If we would be able to fit in in flows (some drivers may), then ok. If not, we extend the api with couple of more l2/l3 related ndos. I see no problem there. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
