On 21/08/2014 19:18, Jiri Pirko wrote:
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static noinline size_t if_nlmsg_size(const struct net_device *dev, + rtnl_port_size(dev, ext_filter_mask) /* IFLA_VF_PORTS + IFLA_PORT_SELF */ + rtnl_link_get_size(dev) /* IFLA_LINKINFO */ + rtnl_link_get_af_size(dev) /* IFLA_AF_SPEC */ - + nla_total_size(MAX_PHYS_PORT_ID_LEN); /* IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID */ + + nla_total_size(MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN); /* IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID */ }static int rtnl_vf_ports_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ static int rtnl_port_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, static int rtnl_phys_port_id_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) { int err; - struct netdev_phys_port_id ppid; + struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid; err = dev_get_phys_port_id(dev, &ppid); if (err) { @@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = { [IFLA_PROMISCUITY] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, [IFLA_NUM_TX_QUEUES] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, [IFLA_NUM_RX_QUEUES] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, - [IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY, .len = MAX_PHYS_PORT_ID_LEN }, + [IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID] = { .type = NLA_BINARY, .len = MAX_PHYS_ITEM_ID_LEN }, [IFLA_CARRIER_CHANGES] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, /* ignored */ };
just a nit, but if this approach/patch goes in, any reason not to change IFLA_PHYS_PORT_ID to IFLA_PHYS_ITEM_ID?
Or. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
