On 6/25/14, 6:58 PM, Lori Jakab wrote:
On 6/25/14, 5:19 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Lori Jakab <loja...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi Jesse,
On 5/23/14, 2:07 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Lori Jakab <loja...@cisco.com>
wrote:
On 5/21/14, 4:10 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Lorand Jakab
<loja...@cisco.com> wrote:
Implementation of the pop_eth and push_eth actions in the
kernel, and
layer 3 flow support.
Signed-off-by: Lorand Jakab <loja...@cisco.com>
Lori, can you take a look at the thread with Thomas Morin and
see if
the outcome is reasonable to you? It seems like we've reached a
conclusion at this point.
I have been following that thread, and I only submitted version 3
of my
patches since you suggested at some point to include the
Ethertype only
when
absolutely necessary. Based on our previous discussion, it wasn't
absolutely necessary for LISP.
By outcome, I assume you mean this message:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-May/040291.html
In that case, please confirm my interpretation of "unconditionally
include
it when it is part of the protocol" for LISP encapsulated
packets: since
the
LISP encapsulation header doesn't contain the Ethertype of the
packet
that
follows and it can be inferred from the first attribute in the
packet
(which
can only be either IPv4 or IPv6), the Ethertype should not be
included.
Yes, what you have looks conceptually right. I've been waiting until
the other thread concludes to look at the patch in more detail.
Now that I think we can consider the other thread concluded, can
you please
take a look at the patch? In my understanding, the conclusion was
that LISP
as-is should not send Ethertype information over Netlink, not even
in the
tunnel metadata, since the protocol itself doesn't send it on the
wire.
Once we implement GPE (see below), we can change that for
GPE-enabled LISP
tunnels.
Yeah, it seems like the we're all set on this issue. I'll take a look
at the patch tomorrow.
Hi Lori,
Would you mind sending out a rebased version of this series?
I rebased it, but due to recent changes on master the patches don't
work anymore :( I've been hunting the cause today to no avail. I'll
send a new version as soon as I sort it out.
Please find the rebased version here:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-June/042223.html
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
