Good catch thanks. I ditched the first of the two.
Ethan
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:45:22PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> They don't really make sense in a multithreaded architecture. Once
>> flow miss batches are dispatched with, they will be extra useless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com>
>
> I had to resolve a few conflicts due to changes on master. In my tree,
> I see the following in run() in ofproto-dpif.c now:
>
> /* Do not perform any periodic activity below required by 'ofproto' while
> * waiting for flow restore to complete. */
> if (ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) {
> return 0;
> }
>
> /* Do not perform any periodic activity required by 'ofproto' while
> * waiting for flow restore to complete. */
> if (!ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) {
> struct ofproto_packet_in *pin, *next_pin;
>
> which seems awfully repetitive, but perhaps that's not actually that way
> in your copy.
>
> Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
