On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:45:22PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote: > They don't really make sense in a multithreaded architecture. Once > flow miss batches are dispatched with, they will be extra useless. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com>
I had to resolve a few conflicts due to changes on master. In my tree, I see the following in run() in ofproto-dpif.c now: /* Do not perform any periodic activity below required by 'ofproto' while * waiting for flow restore to complete. */ if (ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) { return 0; } /* Do not perform any periodic activity required by 'ofproto' while * waiting for flow restore to complete. */ if (!ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) { struct ofproto_packet_in *pin, *next_pin; which seems awfully repetitive, but perhaps that's not actually that way in your copy. Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev