On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 06:45:22PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> They don't really make sense in a multithreaded architecture. Once
> flow miss batches are dispatched with, they will be extra useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <[email protected]>
I had to resolve a few conflicts due to changes on master. In my tree,
I see the following in run() in ofproto-dpif.c now:
/* Do not perform any periodic activity below required by 'ofproto' while
* waiting for flow restore to complete. */
if (ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) {
return 0;
}
/* Do not perform any periodic activity required by 'ofproto' while
* waiting for flow restore to complete. */
if (!ofproto_get_flow_restore_wait()) {
struct ofproto_packet_in *pin, *next_pin;
which seems awfully repetitive, but perhaps that's not actually that way
in your copy.
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
