On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:45 PM, ravi kerur <rke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As mentioned earlier, in the best interest of the time(both mine and > yours) > > I will have to re-evaluate whether to continue working on both mpls and > qinq > > and get back to you. Its just not working out as I have done everything > that > > has been asked and what doesn't make technical sense to me I have always > > resorted to discussion and giving the reasons why it is implemented that > > way. > > I agree that this is not working. At this point, I think this thread > is probably the longest that we've ever had on the mailing list and I > don't really see that we're making progress towards me being able to > apply it. <rk> This thread will go on forever because what you are proposing is not making any sense to me and what I have implemented does not make sense to you. Furthermore, I cannot force you to take this patch and similarly you cannot force me to implement something which I think is wrong as both short term and long term solution. So I agree as well its best to stop here. I hope that somebody will be able to pick up the patch in > the future and use it as a starting point. > <rk> I will probably give the patch if someone requests to work on it.
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
