Alright, I'll remove the XXX and merge. Thanks for reviewing this quickly.
Ethan On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 03:05:42PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> Good catch. Here's an incremental. The real solution to this problem, of >> course, is to get your worker series reviewed, and move port additions and >> deletions into it. Also, as you suggested offline, it may make sense to pull >> sending of CFMs into its own process. > > I think your XXX comments are a bit too alarmist because we haven't > been able to spot any actual inconsistencies, we're only worried about > the possibility, especially as the code continues to evolve. > > Otherwise this is fine, thank you. > > Thanks, > > Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
