I'm OK with it then. I'm still looking over code for 2/3.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:26:23AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Should be fine, cfm_run() pretty much only deals with the internal CFM > state machine which cfm_compose_ccm() doesn't really care about. > > Ethan > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:51:35PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > >> It's very important to get CCMs out as quickly as possible to avoid > >> causing a fault when there is really no problem. This patch sends > >> CCMs as part of port_run_fast() in an attempt to move in this > >> direction. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com> > > > > This changes the order of the calls to cfm_should_send_ccm() and > > cfm_run(). Will that have an adverse effect? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
