On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 06:51:32PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Since port additions and deletions can be very expensive, it makes > sense to keep coverage for them. > > Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson <et...@nicira.com>
I think these duplicate the dpif_port_add and dpif_port_del counters. (If you think that ofproto is a better place for them, please remove the dpif versions.) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
