On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 03:05:42PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote: > Good catch. Here's an incremental. The real solution to this problem, of > course, is to get your worker series reviewed, and move port additions and > deletions into it. Also, as you suggested offline, it may make sense to pull > sending of CFMs into its own process.
I think your XXX comments are a bit too alarmist because we haven't been able to spot any actual inconsistencies, we're only worried about the possibility, especially as the code continues to evolve. Otherwise this is fine, thank you. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
