> On Dec 29, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
>
> Am 29.12.20 um 17:32 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:40 PM
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Policy to deal with old web content - Archiving pages?
>>> Maybe we should send pointers to these collections of pages
>>> to dev@ and
>>> judge case by case what to do.
>> I don't think that will bring good results.
>> Is there any problem to archive all pages? If so, which one?
>> Why do I say (ask) this?
>> Because, if we pick out only certain pages, the amount of work to
>> distinguish important pages from unimportant pages is huge and errors can
>> creep in very easily, and thus the loss of important pages.
>
> right, and here you have misunderstood me. ;-)
>
> Of course where it's clear just move it to the archive. This should be the
> general way and process.
Neither you nor Jörgen are clear what you mean by an archive. Please define it
carefully. Think about how much work yet another website would be. I think it
is an incorrect approach.
>
> But there will be pages - or collection of pages - where it's not clear. Here
> we can judge case by case. Of course these shouldn't be many.
There are many, many more obsolete pages than you think - start here:
http://www.openoffice.org/projects/
Regards,
Dave
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>>> These pages are outdated in parts, but still there is no
>>> more current information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We don't need a super solution, we just need a reliable(!)
>>> archive for previous web and wiki pages, i.e. an archive of
>>> which we are sure that it includes all previous content.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, an 'intelligent' search engine tagging would be
>>> a nice-to-have, but I wouldn't really want to spend time on
>>> that, especially since, as I just described with an example,
>>> it's difficult to clearly tell which pages are really outdated.
>>>>
>>>> Much easier, and imho functionally sufficient, would be a
>>> footer on each archive page informing that this is an archive
>>> page plus a link to the start page (web and wiki) of the
>>> current pages.
>>>
>>> The footer is only visible when you scroll comletely down. But many
>>> pages are longer and the searched information is maybe not
>>> far away from
>>> the top. Then you don't notice that the content is outdated.
>>>
>>> I don't recomemnd to put it in the footer. Having it on top
>>> is more helpful.
>> very gladly we can write the information alternatively in the header!
>> (Or do you think I want to discuss whether header or footer? I don't care,
>> any pragmatic solution is welcome.)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
