Am 16.09.2018 um 21:59 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > No Idea. I have 10 issues on the list. Maybe they do not have a > release blocker?
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=74793 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 According to Marcus I could grant them myself. And I could commit them to 4.1.6, they are really small fixes. > > On 9/16/18 9:56 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 16.09.2018 um 11:29 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Awesome! thanks a lot. >>> >>> + I managed to switch my user account to the committer email, yay. >>> >>> And I managed to query for the flag, and chgecked all suggestions and >>> worked them through. >> Thanks! >> You left two requests (from me) open... >> Maybe because they are already fixed (in trunk)? >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >>> On 9/16/18 11:12 AM, Marcus wrote: >>>> Am 15.09.2018 um 10:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>> Am 15.09.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>> Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>>>>>> Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none? >>>>>> No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6. >>>>>> And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> At least this is my understanding... >>>>> That said, can someone please ensure that Peter is in the group >>>>> "relman" >>>>> in our Bugzilla?! >>>>> >>>>> I would have a look myself but as I wrote several times before I >>>>> don't >>>>> have sufficient rights... >>>> I've added Matthias and Peter to the "relman" group in BZ. Hopefully >>>> with the correct user names. ;-) >>>> >>>> Please check for yourself if it's working now. >>>> >>>> Marcus >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Peter, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>>>>>>>> Okay I had a look now. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 >>>>>>>>> reports. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are these all of them? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I >>>>>>>>> have to >>>>>>>>> note the issue number. :( >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone >>>>>>>>> wants >>>>>>>>> still to add from the dev list? >>>>>>>> There are more to come... ;-) >>>>>>>> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move >>>>>>>> forward. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> All the best >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I >>>>>>>>>> want to >>>>>>>>>> add one patch concerning mailmerge. >>>>>>>>>> And then off we go, I Think. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x >>>>>>>>>> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one >>>>>>>>>> else >>>>>>>>>> is moving to 4.2.0. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski >>>>>>>>>> <j...@jagunet.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the >>>>>>>>>>> RM on >>>>>>>>>>> whether it really is one or not ;) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>>>>>>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>>>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to >>>>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many >>>>>>>>>>> patches and >>>>>>>>>>> fixes, as feasible for those users. >>>>>>>>>>>> Definitely! >>>>>>>>>>>> We already have some release blocker asked for. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How to proceed? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel >>>>>>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about this one: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases, it >>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zero-risk >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I >>>>>>>>>>> understand >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In general, release blockers should be: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - important bugfixes for users >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compiler) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or a >>>>>>>>>>> newer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows release... just an example) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>> finally >>>>>>>>>>>>>> find its way into a release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
