Am 06.09.2018 um 15:25 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on whether it > really is one or not ;) > > BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!
Windows builds (based on r1839814) are up: https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-416-Test/ > >> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that they can >>> use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for older >>> platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make 4.1.6 as good >>> and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and fixes, as feasible >>> for those users. >> Definitely! >> We already have some release blocker asked for. >> >> How to proceed? >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Andrea, >>>> >>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>> How about this one: >>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process. >>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a >>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it wouldn't >>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk and >>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I understand >>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. >>>>> >>>>> In general, release blockers should be: >>>>> - important bugfixes for users >>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) >>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a newer >>>>> Windows release... just an example) >>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) >>>> >>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would finally >>>> find its way into a release. >>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Andrea. >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
