Hi Peter, Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Okay I had a look now. > > I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag. > > I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 reports. > > Are these all of them? > > > - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have to > note the issue number. :( > > > Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone wants > still to add from the dev list?
There are more to come... ;-) If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move forward. Regards, Matthias > > All the best > > Peter > > On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want to >> add one patch concerning mailmerge. >> And then off we go, I Think. >> >> >> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x >> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one else >> is moving to 4.2.0. >> >> >> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski >> <j...@jagunet.com>: >>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on >>> whether it really is one or not ;) >>> >>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds! >>> >>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel >>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that they >>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for >>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make >>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and >>> fixes, as feasible for those users. >>>> Definitely! >>>> We already have some release blocker asked for. >>>> >>>> How to proceed? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Matthias >>>> >>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel >>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>> How about this one: >>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >>>>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process. >>>>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a >>>>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it >>> wouldn't >>>>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk >>> and >>>>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I >>> understand >>>>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In general, release blockers should be: >>>>>>> - important bugfixes for users >>>>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) >>>>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a >>> newer >>>>>>> Windows release... just an example) >>>>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would >>> finally >>>>>> find its way into a release. >>>>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
