Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?
No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6. And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't. At least this is my understanding... Regards, Matthias > > On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Okay I had a look now. >>> >>> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag. >>> >>> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6 reports. >>> >>> Are these all of them? >>> >>> >>> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have to >>> note the issue number. :( >>> >>> >>> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone wants >>> still to add from the dev list? >> There are more to come... ;-) >> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move forward. >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >>> All the best >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>>> I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want to >>>> add one patch concerning mailmerge. >>>> And then off we go, I Think. >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x >>>> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one else >>>> is moving to 4.2.0. >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski >>>> <j...@jagunet.com>: >>>>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM on >>>>> whether it really is one or not ;) >>>>> >>>>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds! >>>>> >>>>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel >>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jim, >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>>>>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO that >>>>>>> they >>>>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build for >>>>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to make >>>>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches and >>>>> fixes, as feasible for those users. >>>>>> Definitely! >>>>>> We already have some release blocker asked for. >>>>>> >>>>>> How to proceed? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel >>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Andrea, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>>>> How about this one: >>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736 >>>>>>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process. >>>>>>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a >>>>>>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases, it >>>>> wouldn't >>>>>>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is zero-risk >>>>> and >>>>>>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I >>>>> understand >>>>>>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In general, release blockers should be: >>>>>>>>> - important bugfixes for users >>>>>>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new compiler) >>>>>>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE, or a >>>>> newer >>>>>>>>> Windows release... just an example) >>>>>>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that would >>>>> finally >>>>>>>> find its way into a release. >>>>>>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
