> From: Hagar Delest [mailto:hagar.del...@laposte.net]
> I think that ODF was designed to be a fully open standard to > give the users back the property of their own data. No, that's not correct. ODF was written this it was compatible with the capabilities of the program OOo. This is a purely technical issue, and does not mean the ODF would therefore not designed open. > But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open > format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits. fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean e.g. the old binary formats has MS disclosed, see: https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/cc313105(v=office.14).aspx https://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/office/gg615407(v=office.14).aspx and please respect one: I'm working for free and open source software for over 10 years, however therefore I do not work primary against MS - for my thinking MS is a competitor, not an enemy for me. Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
