On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, "jan i" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > I can > replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed > it, because the community need more > time to discuss the content. >
That seems crazy, given the long review window and the absence of criticism on this list. The report was openly discussed for longer than I recall any other Board report. Any member claiming there was community opposition should produce evidence to that effect. The report should stand as-is rather than be voided by a private request that seems to fly in the face of the public evidence. S.
