On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
> I'll ask one more time. What action is expected here on dev@ to impact > how the PMC uses private@ ? > I don't think there is any action that can be taken on dev@ beyond pointing out to others here that, when one does not have access to the privileged conversations of the PMC, actions that use those conversations as justification appear hostile, as do dismissive PMC member reactions when simple and reasonable questions are asked about them. Hopefully, recognising how much harm the resulting atmosphere of mistrust does to the project will be remembered. Then PMC members will be heard in the future when they ask that private@ conversations be reiterated or summarised and then continued on dev@. Note that just continuing converstaion is not enough; all dev@ members need to understand the full context rather than being belittled for not knowing it. S.
