On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 +1 +1 ... > > When a project that is committed to working in public raises the draw bridge, > circles the wagons, or goes dark in any way, the detractors win by seeing > their insecurities and animosities confirmed in us. >
And no one has said otherwise. My point is merely that one should be careful about labeling a data point "this year" in comparison with "last year" if this year is not actually 12 months long yet. This is not rocket science, but it does require some thinking to appreciate that the comparisons are sloppy and will be likely confused by the casual reader of the list. > Be of strong heart and goodwill. Stay the course. > > - Dennis > > PS: I am vicariously proud of the work that Rob Weir does to provide an > account for data sources and what the analytics are for the resulting tables > and visuals. That is great, transparent work. When others provide concrete > improvements, rather than using the unavoidable uncertainties to impeach the > work, it raises the bar for all of us. There are those whose adversarial > view of the world only admits the blemishes and not the accomplishments. I > am pleased that such impoverished views be ignored in favor of furthering the > Apache Way. > My suggestion for improvement, in case you missed it, was to compare equal time periods, e.g. January-April 2012 with January-April 2013. -Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 06:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Statistic over committer activity. > > [ ... ] > > We chose to respect the Apache Way and hold all our discussions in > public: all project planning is done on this public list. This is a big > challenge. We have no other channels, so any discussions on how to > attract new developers and any supporting figures that can help that > kind of discussions belong necessarily here. > > On the other side, people who've been around for a while know (and now > Jan knows too!) that numbers that may be functional to support certain > claims will be selectively taken and republished without any kind of > disclaimers or analysis. This happens and will continue to happen, and > if people cannot find figures on this list they will make them up, or > hand-wave, or whatever. > > [ ... ] > > So, more than the numbers themselves (all numbers have problems, > especially when analyzing commits and doing that over different periods > of time), let's keep the good discussion on how we can make contributing > easier for newcomers and occasional contributors. We will always need it. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
