On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
> <orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 26.02.2013 22:48, Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
>>> <orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 09.08.2012 22:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07.08.2012 23:44, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I created a page with this content at
>>>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/legacy/thankyou.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> May be we can use it also for our update service. It could be the
>>>>>> landing page for users of legacy OOo versions for whose language we do
>>>>>> not have a released package.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For those cases it would be better to wait until 3.4.1 is out, then
>>>>> provide, for
>>>>> unsupported languages, some "beta/RC" builds or langpacks based on the
>>>>> same SVN
>>>>> revision and the SDF files we have now and create a page saying
>>>>> something
>>>>> like
>>>>> "your language is not officially supported, but you can help us [links
>>>>> to
>>>>> unofficial builds and instructions]". But this is just an idea that we
>>>>> can
>>>>> discuss after 3.4.1 is released.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I would definitely wait until AOO 3.4.1 is out.
>>>>
>>>> Having unofficial language packs for our unsupported languages would be a
>>>> good idea, esp. to attract some new volunteers for translations.
>>>>
>>>> I will keep your's and Rob's idea in mind for my planned future work on
>>>> the
>>>> update service.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Now that the 3.4.1 language respin is released I'd like to bring back
>>> to mind this earlier discussion.   There are (we assume) many users
>>> out there still running OOo 3.3.0 or earlier.  Even months after 3.4.0
>>> and 3.4.1 were released we get a steady stream of upgrades from OOo
>>> 3.3.0, 3.2.1 and 3.2.0.
>>>
>>> But we're only advertising upgrades for those cases where we have a
>>> translation for that language.  I wonder if we could use the upgrade
>>> notification message as a form of recruitment for translation help in
>>> AOO 4.0?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, the update service could be used for it.
>> For each language we are able to provide its own web site URL. Thus, we
>> could use a landing page URL for languages for which we have no release.
>>
>
> Since these are languages where we don't have sufficient translation
> support, I think we would have a single webpage in English.
>
> Or maybe we also cover other common 2nd languages like French, Spanish
> and Russian, and put them on the same page?
>
> In any case, I'd assume a single destination URL for this notification.
>
>
>> I will have a look, if the message shown in the update service dialog in the
>> running OOo 3.2, 3.2.1 and 3.3 instance can already contain a corresponding
>> short message that the new version is not available in the requested
>> language.
>>
>
> And I'll work on a landing page.
>

Hi Oliver -- here is a draft of what the landing page:
http://www.openoffice.org/projects/untranslated.html

-Rob


>>
>>> One idea would be this:
>>>
>>> 1) Create a landing page on the website that makes the following points:
>>>
>>> a) You are running an older version of OpenOffice.  A more recent one
>>> is available, AOO 3.4.1, available in the following languages...
>>>
>>> b) We're working on a new 4.0 release with many exciting feature
>>> (point to blog post).  We'd love to support your language, but need
>>> help with translation.  If you want to help, or know someone who might
>>> be interested, here is where to find more information on how to get
>>> involved...
>>>
>>> c) Sign up here on the announcement mailing list (or Facebook, or
>>> Twitter or Google+) to be notified when AOO 4.0 is released
>>>
>>> 2) Then enable update notifications for all languages not included in
>>> AOO 3.4.1, and point the user to the new landing page.
>>>
>>> 3) After a week revert the update configuration file on our server to
>>> the earlier state, so users do not get this message repeatedly.  (By
>>> default it should check only once a week).
>>>
>>> I think something like the above would be great to do in the near
>>> term, since it would give enough time for new volunteers to complete
>>> translations in time for AOO 4.0.
>>>
>>
>> +1 from my side.
>> ad 3): may extend to two weeks
>>
>
> OK.
>
> Another benefit of this is we'll get statistics, via Google Analytics,
> on the distribution of languages among those who have not upgraded to
> AOO 3.4.x.  That can help us prioritize for AOO 4.0.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rob
>
>> Best regards, Oliver.

Reply via email to