AFAIK the AI bot is used only to help identify things that are missing in
the PR, so it avoids asking users again and again to fill the Summary, etc.
BTW, I don't think simple things like that need Apache or PMC approval.
It is an open-source project after all and contributions are welcome!
But I'm glad we have you to disagree, it means we are doing the right thing
("Unanimity is always stupid." -- Nelson Rodrigues).
BR,
Alan
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 5:50 AM Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am now the owner of 4 Micron NAND chips and I am at the disposal of
> NuttX developers who want to test code to drive and use them.
>
>
> Tomek: It doesnt change a damn thing.
>
> If LLM are used to make up for contributor laziness that's even worse.
> You'll get unreliable slop when the proper thing to do is close these
> bogus requests and ask contributors to fill actual required information.
>
> Was the use of ai discussed and voted by the project? No need, I'll be
> the only one against it?
>
> Sebastien
>
>
> On 01/10/2024 13:01, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 10:28 AM Sebastien Lorquet <sebast...@lorquet.fr>
> wrote:
> >> (..)
> >> I will not be able to write new code. Specifically if it's now AI
> reviewed.
> > Sebastien the code is not reviewed by the AI it only provides initial
> > feedback on the PR and commit descriptions something we are constantly
> > repeating and asking some reporters to fill in with meaningful content
> > and what should be done correctly in the first place but its often not
> > :-) Humans are still reviewing, commenting, requesting changes,
> > approving, and merging the code no worries :-)
> >
>
