On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 12:40 +0000, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Ian Lynch wrote: > > The main argument is really that its too trivial an issue to waste any > > resources on. I'd say if there is any significant cost at all its not > > worth it. There are far higher priorities. > > > > BTW, I used the same thing with the INGOTs. www.theINGOTS.org. > > But notice that you still call it INGOTs :)
Yes and I still often refer to OpenOffice.org as Open Office too as do most other people. Its a non-issue. That's what I mean. Its not significant to anyone with a few opportunities to use the .org as a talking point. So why spend any effort changing it? > > Interestingly I > > just did a Google search for INGOTs and it comes up with > > > > Premier Ingots and Metals > > Golden Ingots Chinese Symbols of Wealth > > www.theingots.org/ > > Maybe you have a good sysadmin that knows how to raise your Google > rankings :) So when is it going to be top of the list ;-) -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
