Ian Lynch wrote:
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Whether any of that means we should change the name of the
product is a different question. But the arguments for keeping
the "org" don't impress me at all.
The main argument is really that its too trivial an issue to waste any
resources on. I'd say if there is any significant cost at all its not
worth it. There are far higher priorities.
I quite agree with that paragraph. In fact you've given the only
argument that does impress me. :-)
I have probably not been paying close enough attention to the
recurring debate on the name of the product, but I had not got
the impression that what you said ("it's too trivial an issue to
waste any resources on") was the main argument against changing
the name -- indeed, the impression I've got from the pro-org
faction is that having the org is an advantage, and that's what I
was referring to when I said those arguments don't impress me.
Cheers, Jean
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
