[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15136936#comment-15136936
]
Shai Erera commented on SOLR-8621:
----------------------------------
bq. Shall I just revert the particular commit or do we perhaps want to do away
with MergePolicyFactoryArgs at this point?
No need to, I'll handle that.
bq. I will revert the commit that made this class non-abstract
No need to, we can simply skip it when we cherry-pick the commits.
bq. How about factoryClass (or even factory) instead of class element though?
I think 'class' is more consistent with the wrapper {{<mergePolicyFactory
class="">}} element?
> solrconfig.xml: deprecate/replace <mergePolicy> with <mergePolicyFactory>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8621
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Assignee: Christine Poerschke
>
> *<mergePolicyFactory> end-user benefits:*
> * Lucene's UpgradeIndexMergePolicy can be configured in Solr
> * (with SOLR-5730) Lucene's SortingMergePolicy can be configured in Solr
> * customisability: arbitrary merge policies including wrapping/nested merge
> policies can be created and configured
> *(proposed) roadmap:*
> * solr 5.5 introduces <mergePolicyFactory> support
> * solr 5.5(\?) deprecates (but maintains) <mergePolicy> support
> * solr 6.0(\?) removes <mergePolicy> support
> +work-in-progress git branch:+
> [master-solr-8621|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/master-solr-8621]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
