I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
Tim On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature > freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > "Add tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone > have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
