SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to the 5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before Upayavira cuts a release candidate.
Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running > tests so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in. > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins >> pointing at the 5.4 branch. >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote: >> > thx :-) >> > >> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote: >> > > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation >> > > mail >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one >> already >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots >> of >> > > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if >> > > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;) >> > > >> >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks! >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Upayavira >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote: >> > > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 >> into >> > > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there >> are >> > > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Tim >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this >> moment, the feature >> > > >>>>> > freeze starts. >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix >> version 5.4. I >> > > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I >> expect that the >> > > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, >> Noble) blocker >> > > >>>>> > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased >> authorization causes >> > > >>>>> > issue with replication" >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before >> the release? >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) >> critical >> > > >>>>> > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) >> critical >> > > >>>>> > "Add tests for bin/post" >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of >> holding back a >> > > >>>>> > release >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) >> critical >> > > >>>>> > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and >> java 9 (b71)" >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a >> blocker? >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, >> others), blocker >> > > >>>>> > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so >> I will not >> > > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either. >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > - o - >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of >> attention. Anyone >> > > >>>>> > have comments/observations here? >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly. >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > Upayavira >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > ----------------------------------------------------- >> > > > Noble Paul >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > ----------------------------------------------------- >> > > Noble Paul >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > Anshum Gupta >
