I closed LUCENE-6722 as a 'won't fix' On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature > freeze starts. > > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. > > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker > "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes > issue with replication" > > Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical > "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" > > This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical > "Add tests for bin/post" > > Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a > release > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical > "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)" > > Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker > "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" > > Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not > consider this a blocker either. > > - o - > > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone > have comments/observations here? > > I will create the branch shortly. > > Upayavira
-- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
