Hi,

 

I agree: it brings no new functionality. On the other hand it is unlikely to 
break, so if Jenkins passes one time it will pass everytime (unless there is a 
still broken test that parses log output in a random way).!

 

So I would leave it open to release manager to merge it and press the “commit” 
button.

 

Uwe

 

-----

Uwe Schindler

H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen

 <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de

eMail: [email protected]

 

From: Adrien Grand [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 10:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: A 5.4 release?

 

SOLR-8330 is not critical so I don't think it should have been committed to the 
5.4 branch. This gives CI too little time to find problems before Upayavira 
cuts a release candidate.

 

Le jeu. 3 déc. 2015 à 03:34, Anshum Gupta <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > a écrit :

Hi,

 

I'd like to get SOLR-8330 in for 5.4. I'm currently merging and running tests 
so let me know if I shouldn't be merging this in.

 

 

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Upayavira <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Thanks to Steve and Uwe, we now have both ASF and Policeman Jenkins
pointing at the 5.4 branch.

Upayavira


On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> thx :-)
>
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, at 04:07 PM, Noble Paul wrote:
> > OK . So I need to commit my fixes there. I missed the branch creation
> > mail
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Noble Paul <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > > @Upayavira is there a branch created for 5.4 already. I see one already
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected] 
> > > <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >> Do note that this is the Thanksgiving holiday here in the US, lots of
> > >> people are out for the week. Mostly FYI, just don't be surprised if
> > >> you get more traffic on this starting next week ;)
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Timothy Potter <[email protected] 
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>> Ok, those fixes are in 5.4 now, thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Upayavira <[email protected] 
> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>>> I'm for one am okay with these going into 5.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Upayavira
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Timothy Potter wrote:
> > >>>>> I would like to put SOLR-7169 (also fixes 8267) and SOLR-8101 into
> > >>>>> 5.4. I'll commit to trunk and 5x today ... let me know if there are
> > >>>>> any objections to also including in 5.4 branch
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Tim
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Upayavira <[email protected] 
> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:
> > >>>>> > I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, 
> > >>>>> > the feature
> > >>>>> > freeze starts.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 
> > >>>>> > 5.4. I
> > >>>>> > suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect 
> > >>>>> > that the
> > >>>>> > majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) 
> > >>>>> > blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization 
> > >>>>> > causes
> > >>>>> > issue with replication"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the 
> > >>>>> > release?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Add tests for bin/post"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding 
> > >>>>> > back a
> > >>>>> > release
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> > >>>>> >   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 
> > >>>>> > (b71)"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), 
> > >>>>> > blocker
> > >>>>> >   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will 
> > >>>>> > not
> > >>>>> > consider this a blocker either.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >   - o -
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of 
> > >>>>> > attention. Anyone
> > >>>>> > have comments/observations here?
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I will create the branch shortly.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Upayavira
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > Noble Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > Noble Paul
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]> 
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]> 
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 





 

-- 

Anshum Gupta

Reply via email to