[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14983215#comment-14983215 ]
Gwen Shapira commented on KAFKA-2702: ------------------------------------- I'd prefer B, and I think that both Jay and you mentioned the same - the "required" field is not needed and just adds confusion. > ConfigDef toHtmlTable() sorts in a way that is a bit confusing > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: KAFKA-2702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2702 > Project: Kafka > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Gwen Shapira > Assignee: Grant Henke > Attachments: ConsumerConfig-After.html, ConsumerConfig-Before.html > > > Because we put everything without default first (without prioritizing), > critical parameters get placed below low priority ones when they both have > no defaults. Some parameters are without default and optional (SASL server in > ConsumerConfig for instance). > Try printing ConsumerConfig parameters and see the mandatory group.id show up > as #15. > I suggest sorting the no-default parameters by priority as well, or perhaps > adding a "REQUIRED" category that gets printed first no matter what. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)