Hi Frank, thanks for the KIP!
1) For consistency, should we do the same for kafka-share-groups.sh, ShareGroupDescription, etc. ? Even if we do not implement it right now if the share group implementation may still be incomplete, it may make sense to include it in the KIP. 2) Why call it CONSUMER-EPOCH, not MEMBER-EPOCH? That would seem more consistent. Cheers, Lucas On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 2:41 PM Frank Yang <yangp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to kick off the discussion of KIP-1099. This KIP enhances the > kafka-consumer-groups tools to include state which is introduced by KIP-848. > > KIP-1099: Extend kafka-consumer-groups command line tool to support new > consumer group - Apache Kafka - Apache Software Foundation > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1099%3A+Extend+kafka-consumer-groups+command+line+tool+to+support+new+consumer+group> > cwiki.apache.org > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1099%3A+Extend+kafka-consumer-groups+command+line+tool+to+support+new+consumer+group> > [image: favicon.ico] > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1099%3A+Extend+kafka-consumer-groups+command+line+tool+to+support+new+consumer+group> > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-1099%3A+Extend+kafka-consumer-groups+command+line+tool+to+support+new+consumer+group> > > Thank you, > PoAn >
