Hello! I have filed an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12746
I think this is potentially a game breaker and makes me recommend avoiding 2.8, if we release it without fix (for now). If you are using any partitioned caches, anyway. So I suggest we withhold 2.8. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 3 мар. 2020 г. в 20:53, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > Ilya, > > I do not want to force the release no matter what happens, but I think > we should release what we have to get feedback not just from the > developer community but from our users too. > > And fix all these issues in 2.8.1. > > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 20:33, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Can we please hold back publishing AI-2.8.0-rc1 as public Apache Ignite > 2.8 > > release? > > > > I have just been notified that > > > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedColocated > > > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedMixed > > are flaky: they seem to deadlock on putAll sorted keys maps. They used to > > pass solidly on 2.7, but fail on master and ignite-2.8. > > > > (They fail around 1 time out of 10, so just run them 25 times to check) > > > > If there is indeed a deadlock, this would become a blocker to this > release, > > in my opinion, but I need some time to check. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 11:29, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > > > Ivan, > > > > > > > > > I agree with you that the more members will check the release the > > > better will be. That's why I've shared the release candidate links [1] > > > before starting a vote. The best time for starting a vote is not > > > mentioned at our release wiki page [2] (should we?) and I've also > > > failed with googling the best practices for it too. So, I've supposed > > > since all of us are working on their own tasks during weekdays the > > > free time on the weekend is the best choice for cheking\voting on the > > > release. Probably this decision was wrong. > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-8-RELEASE-Time-Scope-Manager-tp43616p46117.html > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process > > > > > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 00:37, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Also I have a comment regarding to voting. Voting for 72 hour > spanning > > > > a weekend sounds a little bit odd to me. In a particular case the > more > > > > people check the release the better. And I suppose there is more time > > > > for it on weekdays for the majority. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 00:33, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a > private > > > PMC list > > > > > Cannot understand why it should be discussed on a private list. > What > > > > > is the clue? > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 16:00, Alexey Zinoviev < > zaleslaw....@gmail.com > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a > private > > > PMC > > > > > > list > > > > > > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 15:12 Ilya Kasnacheev < > > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as my understanding goes, ignite-zookeeper is listed for > > > removal > > > > > > > because it brings a lot of dependencies, some of which may have > > > known > > > > > > > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also > considered > > > > > > > vulnerable by some scanners. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev < > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could be > > > form by > > > > > > > > voting on user-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk < > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, Alexey, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker > image was > > > > > > > discussed > > > > > > > > > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about > > > removing these > > > > > > > > > modules from the product. The idea was to create an > additional > > > > > > > > distribution > > > > > > > > > which is much lighter than the current full package to > reduce > > > the size > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > the downloadable artifact and reduce the number of > potential > > > > > > > > > vulnerabilities in third-party libraries. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The list of modules was chosen subjectively by the number > of > > > questions > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > the user-list, number third-party libraries (size) and > > > vulnerabilities > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > module brings. Given that there are still questions, we are > > > definitely > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > ready to release it in 2.8.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's move discussion to the original thread? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Slim-binary-release-and-docker-image-for-Apache-Ignite-td45110.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
