Hello, Ilya. ignite-jta ignite-zookeeper
Why you suggest to remove these modules? As far as I know, they are used in the real production environment. You can take this vide(in Russian) as an example - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSi_C9_gQMc > 29 февр. 2020 г., в 08:22, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com> > написал(а): > > I have no idea what is the slim package and why the Ml should be remove > from that. We doesnt discuss it before and it looks like very strange list > is not based on previos discussions > > Also, I see, that Ilya has outdated list of modules: we see here removed > tensorflow and missed New Spark 2.4 module. > > Ilya, please update the current list of modules from the Master and later I > share the thread/wiki with the previos discussion about removing package > and ignite extension process. > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 1:17 Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > >> Ilya, >> >> >> Actually I don't remember that we've come to an agreement with the >> list of modules for "slim" distribution. AFAIR, those discussion still >> not finished. >> >> Also, why should we remove `ignite-ml` from current distribution? >> Alexey, should we? >> >> On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 at 00:38, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Sounds reasonable to produce the slim package. Though, if it's time >>> consuming then we should target it to 2.8.1. >>> >>> - >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:36 PM Ilya Kasnacheev < >> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello! >>>> >>>> Are we doing a "slim" package for 2.8, though? >>>> >>>> There was a suggestion to remove the following modules from slim binary >>>> distribution: >>>> >>>> ignite-aop >>>> ignite-aws >>>> ignite-camel >>>> ignite-cassandra-serializers >>>> ignite-cassandra-store >>>> ignite-cloud >>>> ignite-direct-io >>>> ignite-flink >>>> ignite-flume >>>> ignite-gce >>>> ignite-jcl >>>> ignite-jms11 >>>> ignite-jta >>>> ignite-kafka >>>> ignite-mesos >>>> ignite-ml >>>> ignite-mqtt >>>> ignite-osgi >>>> ignite-osgi-karaf >>>> ignite-osgi-paxlogging >>>> ignite-rocketmq >>>> ignite-scalar >>>> ignite-scalar_2.10 >>>> ignite-spark >>>> ignite-ssh >>>> ignite-storm >>>> ignite-tensorflow >>>> ignite-twitter >>>> ignite-web >>>> ignite-yarn >>>> ignite-zeromq >>>> ignite-zookeeper >>>> >>>> Plus, remove benchmarks/ from slim package either. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Ilya Kasnacheev >>>> >>>> >>>> пт, 28 февр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>>> Maxim, >>>>> >>>>> Finally, thanks a lot for starting the voting process! >>>>> >>>>> I've already cast my vote and want to bring up some issues that are >> not >>>>> blockers though: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Ignite technical documentation is not finished yet - @Artem >>>> Budnikov >>>>> <abudni...@gridgain.com> is coordinating this process as well as >>>>> contributes to many open tickets. Even if the vote passes, the >> release >>>>> cannot be *announced* until the docs are finished. I would >> encourage >>>>> everyone involved in 2.8 docs creation to pull together, >> collaborate >>>> and >>>>> complete all the pending tickets throughout the next week. >>>>> 2. Missing API references for Node.JS, Python and PHP clients [1] >> - >>>> need >>>>> to be addressed at least for 2.8.1 since the problem is not new to >>>> 2.8. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Node-JS-PHP-Python-API-references-for-Ignite-2-8-release-td46097.html >>>>> - >>>>> Denis >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:10 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Please use this thread for all non-voting, discussion, questions >>>>>> related to this 2.8.0-rc1 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cast your vote here: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Ignite-2-8-0-RC1-td46140.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
