+1 (non-binding)
> On Jun 29, 2026, at 10:03 AM, Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks Ryan.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:45 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On 2026/06/29 05:13:01 Steve wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 12:10 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]
>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >>
>> > >> It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but
>> > >> they're not blocking.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]
>> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel
>> > >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> vaquar khan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> > >> >> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 um 07:31:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Regards,
>> > >> >>> Viquar Khan
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]
>> > >> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> > >> >>>>
>> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > >> >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> +1 (non binding)
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Regards
>> > >> >>>>> JB
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]
>> > >> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This
>> > >> >>>>>> spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions
>> > >> >>>>>> that Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is
>> > >> >>>>>> intended to clean up expressions used in the REST catalog spec
>> > >> >>>>>> (exchanging query filters) and to enable new use cases that
>> > >> >>>>>> require expressions to be stored in metadata, including
>> > >> >>>>>> expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK`
>> > >> >>>>>> constraints (`col < 360.0`).
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed
>> > >> >>>>>> this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR!
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec
>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . .
>> > >> >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . .
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >> >>>>>>
>> > >> >>>>>> Ryan
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Junwang Zhao
>> >
