+1 Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. dec. 4., Cs, 8:27):
> +1 > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 12:30 AM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Thanks >> > Szehon >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:20 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Yufei >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:16 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM Prashant Singh < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi Everyone, >> >>>> >> >>>> As we discussed before in the idempotency spec, having an >> idempotency key in a mutating endpoint is really beneficial incase of >> clients HTTP retries per [1] (Thank you Huaxin for driving it) >> >>>> >> >>>> I want to propose adding idempotency keys to plan endpoint too, >> since some of them are mutating endpoints having idempotency key for them >> would be helpful for the server to make the call incase the client retries >> the same request, as the course of that i have created a spec PR [2] for >> the same. >> >>>> >> >>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >> >>>> >> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >> >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >>>> >> >>>> Best, >> >>>> Prashant >> >>>> >> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppjdo97l4qpcxn0h0j6zhykgs7d0fpf7 >> >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14730 >> >
