+1

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we discussed before in the idempotency spec, having an idempotency key
> in a mutating endpoint is really beneficial incase of clients HTTP retries
> per [1] (Thank you Huaxin for driving it)
>
> I want to propose adding idempotency keys to plan endpoint too, since some
> of them are mutating endpoints having idempotency key for them would be
> helpful for the server to make the call incase the client retries the same
> request, as the course of that i have created a spec PR [2] for the same.
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Best,
> Prashant
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppjdo97l4qpcxn0h0j6zhykgs7d0fpf7
> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14730
>

Reply via email to