+1 Thanks Szehon
On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:20 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > Yufei > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 11:16 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> As we discussed before in the idempotency spec, having an idempotency >>> key in a mutating endpoint is really beneficial incase of clients HTTP >>> retries per [1] (Thank you Huaxin for driving it) >>> >>> I want to propose adding idempotency keys to plan endpoint too, since >>> some of them are mutating endpoints having idempotency key for them would >>> be helpful for the server to make the call incase the client retries the >>> same request, as the course of that i have created a spec PR [2] for the >>> same. >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>> >>> Best, >>> Prashant >>> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppjdo97l4qpcxn0h0j6zhykgs7d0fpf7 >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14730 >>> >>
