+1 (non-binding)

Christian

Prashant Singh <prashant010...@gmail.com> schrieb am Di. 20. Mai 2025 um
07:34:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Prashant
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:19 PM Aihua Xu <aihu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding).  Great to see we are moving forward.
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:06 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Yufei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:59 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Manish Malhotra <
>>>>>> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is Awesome! Thanks 🙏🏼
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks, it's an exciting step for Iceberg!
>>>>>>>> Szehon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is exciting!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I’ve gone through the changes in detail and I’m confident that
>>>>>>>>>> they are implementable and working.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed and updated row lineage core implementation,
>>>>>>>>>>    readers/writers, and updates to Spark 3.5
>>>>>>>>>>    - Validated the Variant encoding and shredding spec
>>>>>>>>>>    - Built readers/writers for core object models for unknown,
>>>>>>>>>>    timestamp(9) types
>>>>>>>>>>    - Implemented default values and updated read paths
>>>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed table encryption PRs
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread wrapped
>>>>>>>>>>> up, I’d like to raise a vote to adopt the v3 spec changes
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/format/spec.md#version-3-extended-types-and-capabilities>
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *What is included?*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    - Default values for columns and fields
>>>>>>>>>>>    - New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>    - Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic row IDs
>>>>>>>>>>>    and row-level last modified sequence number
>>>>>>>>>>>    - Improved position deletes using binary deletion vectors
>>>>>>>>>>>    that are synchronously maintained
>>>>>>>>>>>    - Table encryption key tracking
>>>>>>>>>>>    - Table metadata support for future multi-argument transforms
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *What does adopting these changes mean?*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community) intend to
>>>>>>>>>>> support the current set of changes and will maintain 
>>>>>>>>>>> forward-compatibility
>>>>>>>>>>> for v3 tables that implement the v3 spec. After adopting the 
>>>>>>>>>>> changes,
>>>>>>>>>>> future breaking changes would go into v4.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As with v2 adoption
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ws2gg52d124p7bx9jgrn3kctrtfgtltp>,
>>>>>>>>>>> this is needed to build support in downstream projects and other
>>>>>>>>>>> implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table version, 
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 and that 
>>>>>>>>>>> we are
>>>>>>>>>>> confident in supporting the v3 features.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this point
>>>>>>>>>>> with the v3 changes!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to