+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Manish Malhotra <
manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> This is Awesome! Thanks 🙏🏼
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks, it's an exciting step for Iceberg!
>> Szehon
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This is exciting!
>>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> I’ve gone through the changes in detail and I’m confident that they are
>>>> implementable and working.
>>>>
>>>>    - Reviewed and updated row lineage core implementation,
>>>>    readers/writers, and updates to Spark 3.5
>>>>    - Validated the Variant encoding and shredding spec
>>>>    - Built readers/writers for core object models for unknown,
>>>>    timestamp(9) types
>>>>    - Implemented default values and updated read paths
>>>>    - Reviewed table encryption PRs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread wrapped up, I’d
>>>>> like to raise a vote to adopt the v3 spec changes
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/format/spec.md#version-3-extended-types-and-capabilities>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> *What is included?*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Default values for columns and fields
>>>>>    - New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and unknown
>>>>>    - Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic row IDs and
>>>>>    row-level last modified sequence number
>>>>>    - Improved position deletes using binary deletion vectors that are
>>>>>    synchronously maintained
>>>>>    - Table encryption key tracking
>>>>>    - Table metadata support for future multi-argument transforms
>>>>>
>>>>> *What does adopting these changes mean?*
>>>>>
>>>>> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community) intend to support
>>>>> the current set of changes and will maintain forward-compatibility for v3
>>>>> tables that implement the v3 spec. After adopting the changes, future
>>>>> breaking changes would go into v4.
>>>>>
>>>>> As with v2 adoption
>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ws2gg52d124p7bx9jgrn3kctrtfgtltp>,
>>>>> this is needed to build support in downstream projects and other
>>>>> implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table version, it
>>>>> signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 and that we are
>>>>> confident in supporting the v3 features.
>>>>>
>>>>> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this point with the
>>>>> v3 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to