+1 (non-binding).  Great to see we are moving forward.

On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:06 PM Denny Lee <denny.g....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:04 PM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 8:59 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 9:37 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:35 AM Manish Malhotra <
>>>> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> This is Awesome! Thanks 🙏🏼
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, it's an exciting step for Iceberg!
>>>>>> Szehon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:03 PM Jia Yu <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is exciting!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’ve gone through the changes in detail and I’m confident that they
>>>>>>>> are implementable and working.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed and updated row lineage core implementation,
>>>>>>>>    readers/writers, and updates to Spark 3.5
>>>>>>>>    - Validated the Variant encoding and shredding spec
>>>>>>>>    - Built readers/writers for core object models for unknown,
>>>>>>>>    timestamp(9) types
>>>>>>>>    - Implemented default values and updated read paths
>>>>>>>>    - Reviewed table encryption PRs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 3:20 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With the follow-ups from the earlier discussion thread wrapped up,
>>>>>>>>> I’d like to raise a vote to adopt the v3 spec changes
>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/format/spec.md#version-3-extended-types-and-capabilities>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *What is included?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    - Default values for columns and fields
>>>>>>>>>    - New types: variant, geospatial, timestamp(9), and unknown
>>>>>>>>>    - Row lineage and change tracking using synthetic row IDs and
>>>>>>>>>    row-level last modified sequence number
>>>>>>>>>    - Improved position deletes using binary deletion vectors that
>>>>>>>>>    are synchronously maintained
>>>>>>>>>    - Table encryption key tracking
>>>>>>>>>    - Table metadata support for future multi-argument transforms
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *What does adopting these changes mean?*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Adopting the changes signals that we (the community) intend to
>>>>>>>>> support the current set of changes and will maintain 
>>>>>>>>> forward-compatibility
>>>>>>>>> for v3 tables that implement the v3 spec. After adopting the changes,
>>>>>>>>> future breaking changes would go into v4.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As with v2 adoption
>>>>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/ws2gg52d124p7bx9jgrn3kctrtfgtltp>,
>>>>>>>>> this is needed to build support in downstream projects and other
>>>>>>>>> implementations. Adoption doesn’t change the default table version, it
>>>>>>>>> signals that there will be no further break changes in v3 and that we 
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> confident in supporting the v3 features.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Huge thanks to everyone that has worked to get to this point with
>>>>>>>>> the v3 changes!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Adopt the v3 changes to the table spec
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Wait to close v3 changes because . . .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to