+1 checked the signatures, checksums build and run some tests
Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. febr. 26., Sze, 6:11): > +1 (binding) > > Verified signatures, checksum, RAT checks. > Ran build and test with JDK17 > > Thanks, > Amogh Jahagirdar > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:30 AM Honah J. <hon...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Checked signatures and checksum >> - Checked license >> - Full Build and Test >> >> Best regards, >> Honah >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:52 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> Checked Sigs and Checksum >>> Ran Rat >>> Ran full build/test >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> - Checked signatures and checksum >>>> - Checked licenses >>>> - Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Fokko >>>> >>>> Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> I followed "How to Verify a Release" >>>>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release>. >>>>> Checked out artifact from SVN, >>>>> ``` >>>>> svn checkout >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1/ >>>>> . >>>>> ``` >>>>> >>>>> Verified >>>>> * Signature Good >>>>> * Checksum Ok >>>>> * RAT check passed. 1 unrelated error message >>>>> ``` >>>>> ERROR: Ignored 0 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty >>>>> lines. >>>>> ``` >>>>> * Build + test passed, running on Java 17.0.6 (openjdk 17.0.6 >>>>> 2023-01-17 LTS) on M1 >>>>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>>>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests, >>>>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/11 >>>>> >>>>> I ran the tests both with and without the docker daemon. Without >>>>> docker, a few tests failed in `iceberg-aws`, `iceberg-azure`, and >>>>> `iceberg-kafka-connect`. There's already an issue to track this at >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236. >>>>> I'm also continuing to see the flakey test for `iceberg-core`'s >>>>> `testConcurrentFastAppends` test. I believe this is a local issue with my >>>>> machine. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for running the release, Eduard! >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Kevin Liu >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> - Hash and checksum are good >>>>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK in different distributed artifacts (source >>>>>> distribution, aws bundle, etc) >>>>>> - ASF header present in all expected files >>>>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>>> - Did quick smoke tests >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner >>>>>> <etudenhoef...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>>>> Iceberg 1.8.1 release. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The commit ID is 9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>>>> > >>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>>>> repository URL is: >>>>>> > * >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1184/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 >>>>>> > [ ] +0 >>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members >>>>>> are encouraged to cast >>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>>>> votes and more binding >>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>
