+1 (binding) - Checked signatures and checksum - Checked license - Full Build and Test
Best regards, Honah On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:52 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > Checked Sigs and Checksum > Ran Rat > Ran full build/test > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Checked signatures and checksum >> - Checked licenses >> - Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> I followed "How to Verify a Release" >>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release>. >>> Checked out artifact from SVN, >>> ``` >>> svn checkout >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1/ >>> . >>> ``` >>> >>> Verified >>> * Signature Good >>> * Checksum Ok >>> * RAT check passed. 1 unrelated error message >>> ``` >>> ERROR: Ignored 0 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty >>> lines. >>> ``` >>> * Build + test passed, running on Java 17.0.6 (openjdk 17.0.6 2023-01-17 >>> LTS) on M1 >>> * Ran a few examples on Spark >>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests, >>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/11 >>> >>> I ran the tests both with and without the docker daemon. Without docker, >>> a few tests failed in `iceberg-aws`, `iceberg-azure`, and >>> `iceberg-kafka-connect`. There's already an issue to track this at >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236. >>> I'm also continuing to see the flakey test for `iceberg-core`'s >>> `testConcurrentFastAppends` test. I believe this is a local issue with my >>> machine. >>> >>> Thanks for running the release, Eduard! >>> >>> Best, >>> Kevin Liu >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> - Hash and checksum are good >>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK in different distributed artifacts (source >>>> distribution, aws bundle, etc) >>>> - ASF header present in all expected files >>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution >>>> - Did quick smoke tests >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner >>>> <etudenhoef...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi Everyone, >>>> > >>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache >>>> Iceberg 1.8.1 release. >>>> > >>>> > The commit ID is 9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>> > * >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d >>>> > >>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: >>>> > * >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1 >>>> > >>>> > You can find the KEYS file here: >>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>> > >>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven >>>> repository URL is: >>>> > * >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1184/ >>>> > >>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>> > >>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.1 >>>> > [ ] +0 >>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... >>>> > >>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are >>>> encouraged to cast >>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 >>>> votes and more binding >>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes. >>>> > >>>> >>>
