+1
 Checked Sigs and Checksum
 Ran Rat
 Ran full build/test

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:30 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@driesprong.frl>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
>    - Checked signatures and checksum
>    - Checked licenses
>    - Spotchecked NOTICE/LICENSE
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op di 25 feb 2025 om 16:56 schreef Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org>:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> I followed "How to Verify a Release"
>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release>.
>> Checked out artifact from SVN,
>> ```
>> svn checkout
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1/
>> .
>> ```
>>
>> Verified
>> * Signature Good
>> * Checksum Ok
>> * RAT check passed. 1 unrelated error message
>> ```
>> ERROR: Ignored 0 lines in your exclusion files as comments or empty lines.
>> ```
>> * Build + test passed, running on Java 17.0.6 (openjdk 17.0.6 2023-01-17
>> LTS) on M1
>> * Ran a few examples on Spark
>> * Ran pyiceberg integration tests,
>> https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/11
>>
>> I ran the tests both with and without the docker daemon. Without docker,
>> a few tests failed in `iceberg-aws`, `iceberg-azure`, and
>> `iceberg-kafka-connect`. There's already an issue to track this at
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/12236.
>> I'm also continuing to see the flakey test for `iceberg-core`'s
>> `testConcurrentFastAppends` test. I believe this is a local issue with my
>> machine.
>>
>> Thanks for running the release, Eduard!
>>
>> Best,
>> Kevin Liu
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 4:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>
>>> - Hash and checksum are good
>>> - LICENSE and NOTICE are OK in different distributed artifacts (source
>>> distribution, aws bundle, etc)
>>> - ASF header present in all expected files
>>> - No binary file found in the source distribution
>>> - Did quick smoke tests
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner
>>> <etudenhoef...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Everyone,
>>> >
>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>> Iceberg 1.8.1 release.
>>> >
>>> > The commit ID is 9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d
>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1
>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1
>>> > *
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/9ce0fcf0af7becf25ad9fc996c3bad2afdcfd33d
>>> >
>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>> > *
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.8.1-rc1
>>> >
>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>>> > * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository
>>> URL is:
>>> > *
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1184/
>>> >
>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>> >
>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.8.1
>>> > [ ] +0
>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>> >
>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>> encouraged to cast
>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes
>>> and more binding
>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to