Hi Cheng,

Thanks for the update. The issue appeared in the test, but I guess it
can also impact runtime use.

Let me take a look at the update PR.

Regards
JB

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 3:06 PM Cheng Pan <pan3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Spark 3.5.4 (under RC3 voting) introduces a breaking change that requires 
> Iceberg to be patched[1]. Please include Spark 3.5.4 support in the patch 
> release.
>
> Since some users are sticky to Java 8, it would be great if Iceberg also 
> releases a new patch version of 1.6.x, otherwise they won’t be able to use 
> the latest Spark version combined with Iceberg.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11731
>
> Thanks,
> Cheng Pan
>
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2024, at 17:58, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> That works for me. In the meantime, I will draft a proposal (in terms
> of content) for 1.8.0.
>
> I volunteer to drive 1.7.2 release if needed.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:58 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for raising this Alex,
>
> I suggest doing a 1.7.2 patch release since we don't want to leave the 1.7.x 
> version in a broken state for the ADLSFileIO.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op di 17 dec 2024 om 07:40 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> It was exactly my concern (and question) when I did the review on the PR.
>
> I agree it's breaking change and definitely not good in a micro/patch release.
>
> As 1.7.0 is still working, I would propose to wait 1.8.0 if possible:
> I'm actually preparing a new thread with 1.8.0 proposal (in terms of
> timing and content like improved security/auth flow in REST).
>
> Would it work for you or are you calling for 1.7.2 ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 1:06 AM Alex Reid <alex.james.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Just a heads up, but I believe this PR 
> (https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11504) that was added to the 1.7.1 
> introduced a breaking change for anyone previously supporting ADLSFileIO / 
> credentials with sasTokens. I added some details in the PR comments, but will 
> also provide those details here as well since the PR is closed.
>
> On initialization of ADLSFileIO, AzureProperties is created and builds a map 
> of account -> sasToken here when you create ADLSFileIO using adls.sas-token. 
> as the credential mechanism.
>
> Prior to this change, the account passed in here (which is used to lookup the 
> sasToken from the map mentioned above) was parsed to include 
> .dfs.core.windows.net so when generating the adls.sas-token. property to pass 
> into ADLSFileIO, you needed to include .dfs.core.windows.net as part of the 
> adls.sas-token. property name. After this change, we are parsing the 
> ADLSLocation account to NOT include adls.sas-token., so now the sasToken 
> lookup from the map doesn't find the sasToken. When someone updates to 1.7.1, 
> they will/would also need to update how they are configuring / building the 
> ADLSFileIO properties when using sasTokens.
>
>
> -alex
>
>

Reply via email to